Sudan’s military has launched major operations in Khartoum, capturing the presidential palace and key institutions, marking a significant shift in the civil war. With journalists from The New York Times observing, the situation reveals the gravity of conflict but offers little hope for resolution. Special forces expressed a strong commitment to combat opposing paramilitary forces, indicating ongoing tensions.
Recent developments in Sudan reveal significant military actions in Khartoum, highlighting a pivotal shift in the ongoing civil war. On a Sunday afternoon, soldiers congregated at the presidential palace, now a battle-scarred edifice, preparing to eradicate remaining resistance from paramilitary fighters. This occurred after Sudan’s military took control of the palace and launched efforts to secure the city from conflict.
In a dramatic turn of events, the military’s control expanded to include key sites such as the Central Bank of Sudan and the headquarters of the national intelligence service, marking a notable shift in the conflict after two years of warfare. This surge in military dominance signifies a possible change in the trajectory of Sudan’s civil war.
The New York Times journalists became the first Western reporters to access central Khartoum and visit the presidential palace since the outbreak of hostilities in April 2023. Their observations underscore the heightened tensions and the difficult situation prevailing in the region, instilling little optimism for a swift resolution.
Mohamed Ibrahim, a special forces officer, vehemently stated, “We will never leave our country to the mercenaries,” referring to the Rapid Support Forces (R.S.F.). The statement reflects the fierce determination of the military as they grapple with internal rivalries and the enduring strife that characterizes this tumultuous period in Sudanese history.
In summary, the recent military advances in Khartoum represent a crucial juncture in Sudan’s civil war, with the military making significant territorial gains. The battle-scarred environment of the presidential palace, along with the capture of strategic establishments, illuminates the profound changes in the conflict landscape. However, the path to peace remains obscured, with ongoing resistance and deep-seated rivalries continuing to challenge stability.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
