In a private UN briefing, Russia criticized Syria’s new leadership for rising jihadism and sectarian violence while reaffirming the importance of national unity. Russian envoy Vassily Nebenzia likened the violence to Rwandan genocide, reflecting Russia’s concerns over its military interests in the region. The Kremlin’s critique aims to help restore its influence amid shifting political dynamics.
In a private United Nations briefing, Russia denounced the newly established leadership in Syria, expressing concerns about a potential rise in jihadism and drawing parallels to the Rwandan genocide. This criticism arises as Russia seeks to maintain its foothold through two significant military bases in the coastal region, where recent violence led to the killings of numerous Alawites. The attacks, attributed to ex-army loyalists of ousted leader Bashar al-Assad, resulted in widespread violence across multiple provinces.
The Kremlin’s position has evolved since Assad’s departure to Russia in December. Despite earlier support for Assad, Moscow now advocates for national unity within Syria while simultaneously engaging in discussions with various countries regarding the crisis. The remarks made by Russia during the Security Council briefing, a collaborative effort with the United States, were particularly critical, emphasizing its strategic aim to regain influence in Syria.
According to sources, Russian envoy Vassily Nebenzia likened the sectarian violence in Syria to the historic Rwandan genocide, marking a significant shift in language used during closed discussions. He noted the lack of intervention in the ongoing violence, asserting, “no one” had halted the killings in Syria. Nebenzia’s comments highlight the delicate position Russia is navigating as it seeks to balance criticism of Syria’s Islamist rulers with a desire to retain their own influence.
Experts indicate that Russia’s private critique reflects its cautious approach. Anna Borshchevskaya, a specialist in Russian affairs, mentioned that Moscow aims to restore its position in Syria without jeopardizing its strategic interests. She observed, “Russia also wants to be seen as a great power, equal to the U.S. and resolving crises together with the U.S.”
Nebenzia also cautioned that the dismantling of Syria’s army and the significant reduction of public workforce could lead to a repetition of Iraq’s post-Saddam Hussein turmoil. Following the overthrow of Assad, new leaders, including foreign fighters integrated into the military framework, face substantial challenges in establishing legitimacy and stability.
In a recent interview, Syria’s interim president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, conveyed a commitment to avoiding sectarian divisions and indicated that forthcoming government formations may include Alawite individuals. He emphasized the importance of maintaining positive relations with Russia, asserting a desire to avoid any discord between Syria and its historical ally.
During the closed meeting, Russian representatives described the shifts under the new regime as creating a “corrupt foundation” for a peaceful transition, noting concerns regarding the destructive role of foreign fighters. The Security Council is currently considering a statement to condemn the violence in Syria and to call for the protection of all citizens, regardless of their ethnic or religious backgrounds, essential for future diplomatic engagements with the international community.
In summary, Russia’s private yet pointed criticism of Syria’s new leadership signals significant concern over escalating violence and sectarian strife. The Kremlin’s strategy appears oriented toward preserving its influence while advocating for national unity, reflecting on historical precedents such as the Rwandan genocide. As negotiations continue within the United Nations Security Council, the dynamics of inclusion and representation in the Syrian governance structure will be pivotal for international re-engagement.
Original Source: www.usnews.com
