India is urged to take a proactive role in mediating the Ukraine-Russia war, leveraging its favorable diplomatic position, timing, and national interests. Despite fears of failure, mediation can enhance India’s global status. Engaging in this diplomatic endeavor aligns with India’s aspirations in a multipolar world.
The notion that India should defer mediation in global conflicts, such as the Ukraine-Russia war, until it attains greater power is flawed. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) indicated last year its willingness to support peaceful resolutions for complex international issues. With Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Kyiv in August, India is presented with a timely opportunity to facilitate peace in Ukraine.
India has skillfully navigated the crisis without directly condemning Russia’s actions, balancing its relations with both Russia and the West. This strategic approach has proven beneficial, yet the changing dynamics of global power necessitate a more active role for India. As discussions to resolve the conflict are underway, India can propose its mediation to foster ceasefire negotiations involving both Russia and Ukraine, including dialogues with American officials.
There are three compelling reasons for India’s immediate mediation in this conflict. Firstly, the current geopolitical climate is ripe for action as Russia seeks to alleviate sanctions while simultaneously engaging with the US, particularly amidst ongoing discussions in Riyadh. Secondly, India enjoys a relatively favorable position among major stakeholders, being one of the few nations accepted by Russia, Europe, and Ukraine alike. Thirdly, facilitating mediation aligns with India’s aspirations as a burgeoning global power, establishing critical links to various world capitals.
Should a ceasefire materialize, Ukraine would likely require assurances against future Russian threats. The potential deployment of Indian peacekeepers, known for their experience and impartiality, could exemplify India’s commitment to stability in the region. India is encouraged not to be a passive participant but to take a pivotal role in negotiations and peacekeeping efforts.
However, concerns over potential failure have inhibited India’s involvement. Notably, unsuccessful negotiations often yield geopolitical benefits and enhance the mediator’s status. Third-party mediation facilitates dialogue rather than guaranteeing conflict resolution. India should consider appointing a special envoy to engage with various conflict parties and explore negotiation avenues.
Critics argue that India needs to bolster its power before mediating in global affairs; however, India’s economic strength significantly exceeds that of several other nations currently involved in mediation efforts. The effectiveness of mediation rests more on political resolve and opportunity rather than economic size. Given India’s historical experiences with mediation and its burgeoning aspirations on the global stage, the time has arrived for India to assume a more active role in resolving international conflicts such as the Ukraine war.
In conclusion, India’s potential to mediate in the Ukraine-Russia war is underscored by strategic timing, acceptable standing among involved parties, and alignment with national interests. Overcoming fears of failure is essential for India to embrace a diplomatic role that not only favors international stability but also enhances its status as a global power. The country should capitalize on this opportunity to assert itself in the realm of international conflict resolution actively.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
