Syria’s transition from Bashar al-Assad has not resolved sectarian tensions. Violence continues as the new regime grapples with balancing minority reassurance and radical elements. Recent clashes illustrate ongoing instability in the nation, highlighting the complexities of the new political landscape.
Syria has recently transitioned from Bashar al-Assad’s rule; however, sectarian tensions persist within the country. The new leaders face challenges in balancing the need to reassure minority groups while also catering to their jihadist constituents. On February 26, violence erupted in Latakia when security forces killed four individuals, including an army officer from the old regime who had been promised amnesty. The following day, locals in Qardaha, Assad’s hometown, retaliated against authorities for setting up a checkpoint leading to a protester’s death.
Further unrest unfolded as clashes erupted in three coastal cities when supporters of the new Sunni Islamist government confronted Alawite-dominated neighborhoods, displaying machetes and al-Qaeda flags. A subsequent outbreak of violence occurred in Jaramana, a suburb of Damascus, when government forces attempted to dismantle barricades set up by the local Druze community, another minority sect. Despite a shift in governance, issues of violence and sectarianism remain prevalent in Syria, indicating that new leadership has not eradicated old conflicts.
In summary, although Syria has removed Bashar al-Assad from power, the country remains mired in sectarian violence and unrest. The new ruling authorities are struggling to maintain peace between minority sects and radical factions, complicating the political and social landscape. The persisting violence reflects that changing leadership does not automatically resolve deep-seated societal divisions. Consequently, Syria faces an ongoing battle for stability amidst entrenched tensions.
Original Source: www.economist.com
